Welcome to High School A Guide to Student Rights
A Web Quest for 9th Grade United States Government students Designed
by: Kim
Jakovics
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Research on your high school shows that
ninth grade students are not as successful academically and behaviorally
as other grades. Ninth graders have higher failure rates and
more behavioral referrals. |
|
| Your high school is trying to find a way to help students successfully transition from middle to high school. Your principal has invited you, a current ninth grade student, to help prepare an orientation program for incoming freshmen. They feel that since you have recently gone through the transition, you will have valuable insight to offer on what the rights, responsibilities, and limitations are of high school students. Hopefully with your help, the incoming freshmen will have a better understanding of what they may do in high school. |
Introduction
| Task | Process | Resources
| Evaluation | Conclusion
| Credits
|
"It can hardly be argued that either
students or teachers shed their Constitutional rights to freedom
of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." |
The orientation committee has assigned you the task of
preparing an interactive teaching tool for incoming freshmen that explains
students' rights in high school.
| Issue: | How have landmark Supreme Court cases impacted the
rights of students in high school? |
| Organizational Web: | Your team will organize your research and ideas
using the organizational
research log. |
| Student Orientation Guide: | After researching, your team must create an interactive teaching tool for incoming ninth graders that clearly explains their legal rights and limitations as students. |
| The product must include accurate content, appropriate graphics, and effective writing (see the rubric below). | |
| 1) Team Organization You will be assigned to a team of 6-7 students who will design the product together. During your first organizational meeting, make the following decisions and submit the Team Form to your instructor:
|
| 2) Research Your team will research Landmark Supreme Court cases that define the rights of students in school on each of the following topics:
See the resources section below for approved research sites. |
| 3) Organize your research As you research, use the Research Log to unify your findings. For each issue, you must identify:
|
| 4) Create your product Your team must create an interactive teaching tool for incoming ninth graders that clearly explains their legal rights and limitations as students. Your team must now decide what type of layout would best accommodate your information, how you want your product to look, and how you want your product to read. Some ideas are a brochure, newsletter, non-linear
PowerPoint presentation, web page or booklet. Remember that
you created "experts" to manage the design phase and
should divide the work accordingly. |
| 5)
Assessment ECR: (Provided by the Anne Arundel County Bar Association) The actions of the United States Supreme Court impact decisions and policies formulated on the local, public school level. The Supreme Court will hear a case during the current session that could establish the extent to which schools may be subject to drug testing. In the 1995 case of Vernonia School District vs. Acton, 515 US 646, the Supreme Court held that public school authorities can require drug tests of student athletes. The Supreme Court is currently considering another case (Board of Education of Tecumseh Public School District, Pottawatomie County vs. Earls) concerning drug testing in public schools, and this time the question is whether a public school can require drug tests of students participating in extracurricular activities.
|
| 6) Evaluate the project
and process. Go to the on-line survey and rate your experience and the functionality and success of your team. |
| Issue | Case Decision | Case Summary |
| Speech | Tinker vs. Des Moines Board of Education | Tinker Summary |
| Bethel
School District vs. Fraser |
Bethel Summary | |
| Publications | Hazelwood
School District vs. Kuhlmeier |
Hazelwood Summary |
| School Searches | New
Jersey vs. TLO |
TLO
Summary |
| Organizational Affiliation | Wallace
vs. Jaffree |
Wallace Summary |
| Westside
Community School vs. Mergens |
Westside Summary | |
| Drug Testing | Vernonia
School District vs. Acton |
Vernonia Summary |
| Pledge of Allegiance | West
Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette |
West Virginia Summary |
| Peer Grading | Owasso Independent School District vs. Falvo |
Introduction | Task | Process | Resources | Evaluation | Conclusion | Credits
Note to AACPS teachers:
| Social Studies Goal and Expectation | Indicators |
This lesson addresses Maryland Core Learning Goal 1 (Political Systems), Expectation 2
|
1.2.1 The student will analyze the impact of landmark Supreme Court decisions on governmental powers, rights and responsibilities of citizens in our changing society. 1.2.3 The student will evaluate the impact of governmental decisions and actions that have affected the rights of individuals and groups in American society and/or have affected maintaining order and safety. |
Student Evaluation
The students will be evaluated as an individual and a group based
upon the tasks submitted in the team planning form.
![]() |
Beginning
1 |
Developing
2 |
Accomplished
3 |
Exemplary
4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content
|
Content is
incomplete and incorrect. Some required elements are addressed. Application shows no understanding. |
Content is
incomplete with some misconceptions. Most required elements are addressed. Application shows minimal understanding. |
Accurate and
complete with few/no misconceptions. All required elements are addressed. Application shows understanding. |
Accurate and
complete, no misconceptions. All required elements are addressed thoroughly. Application shows understanding and insight. |
| Writing
Style Purpose: Writing to
Inform |
Writing purpose
is unclear and ineffective. Writing is unorganized and wordy. There are many grammatical and editorial errors. |
Writing purpose
is vague. Writing lacks conciseness and organization. There are several grammatical and editorial errors. |
Writing purpose
is somewhat clear and effective. Writing is mostly concise and organized. There are few grammatical and editorial errors. |
Writing purpose
is clear and effective. Writing is concise and organized. There are no grammatical or editorial errors. |
| Product
Design
|
Layout choice
is ineffective. Design is unprofessional and confusing. Graphics are inappropriate and detract from design. |
Layout choice
neither adds nor detracts from presentation. Design is somewhat disorganized and amateur. Graphics are appropriate and neither add nor detract from the design. |
Layout choice
provides an effective presentation. Design is mostly organized and professional. Graphics somewhat enhance the design. |
Layout choice
provides an outstanding presentation. Design is professional and organized. Graphics are used effectively and enhance design. |
| Group
Functioning
|
Group is dysfunctional. No ideas were welcomed. No work completed by deadline. Work quality is poor. |
Group functions
with several disturbances and imbalanced distribution of work. Some ideas were welcomed. Minimal work completed by deadline. Work quality is acceptable. |
Group functions
with few disturbances and somewhat equitably. Ideas were mostly welcomed. Most work completed by deadlines. Work quality is good. |
Group functions
efficiently and equitably. All ideas were welcomed. All work completed by deadline. All work high quality. |
Introduction | Task | Process | Resources | Evaluation | Conclusion | Credits
After completing this activity, the student should have considered the effectiveness of government decisions and actions that were made to affect the rights of individuals and groups in the United States.
Follow-up tasks: 1. Complete the extended constructed response. 2. Watch the news for the Board of Education of Tecumseh Public School District, Pottawatomie County vs. Earls to see what the Supreme Court decides this year on random drug testing in schools.
|
Introduction | Task | Process | Resources | Evaluation | Conclusion | Credits
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/ (Supreme Court picture)
Anne Arundel County Bar Association (essay question)
Susan Darnley (ideas and guidance)
Introduction | Task | Process | Resources | Evaluation | Conclusion | Credits